Category Archives: Standard of Care

12 Things You Need to Know about Adviser Referral Arrangements and the Cash Solicitation Rule

OCIE recently issued a Risk Alert on common exam deficiencies in complying with the Cash Solicitation Rule, Rule 206(4)-3, of the Advisers Act. It is not surprising that OCIE decided to highlight referral arrangements since this is an area fraught with regulatory risk. So in addition to OCIE’s insights, we’ve included some other traps for the unwary.

OCIE reviewed deficiency letters from the past three years and cited four common mistakes:

1. Disclosure Documents Failure: Advisers make two common errors. The first is a failure to provide the disclosures required under Rule 206(4)-3 to clients. The second is providing incomplete disclosures.

2. Failure to Have Acknowledgements from Solicited Clients.

3. No Agreement or Inadequate Agreement. OCIE also found that advisers paid fees to solicitors without a written agreement, or using an agreement that did not contain the provisions required by the rule.

4. Failure to Check if Solicitor is Complying with the Agreement. Another common deficiency is the failure of an adviser to follow up to determine whether the solicitor is complying with the terms of the solicitation agreement.

OTHER TRAPS FOR THE UNWARY

In addition to the Risk Alert, we’ve pulled together a hit list of common issues faced by investment advisers when entering into referral arrangements.

First SEC Enforcement Action Against Decentralized Digital Asset Exchange Echoes Recent Public Statements

In the first case of its kind, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced an enforcement action related to EtherDelta, a decentralized digital asset trading platform that the SEC found operated as an unregistered national securities exchange. The enforcement action was brought against Zachary Coburn (Founder) of EtherDelta, rather than against any entity.
 Additional contributors to this post:

12b-1 fees — A Brand New Twist

Under a new self-reporting initiative just announced by the SEC staff, the SEC’s Enforcement Division will recommend “standardized, favorable settlement terms” to investment advisers that self-report that they failed to disclose conflicts of interest associated with the receipt of 12b-1 fees.  This is the latest effort by the SEC to crack–down on inadequate disclosure of adviser receipt of 12b-1 fees in connection with advisory accounts where a lower -cost share class of the same mutual fund was available for the advisory clients. The SEC States that among other things, the Division will recommend settlements that will require the adviser to “disgorge its ill-gotten gains and pay those amounts to harmed clients. ”  The plus:  no civil monetary penalty. Investment advisers must notify the Division of Enforcement of their intent to self-report no later than June 12, 2018.

Read More Here.

The Final Rule: Considerations and Analysis of the DOL’s 18-Month Transition Period Extension

The Department of Labor (DOL) extended until July 1, 2019, the date for compliance with the full conditions in its new “investment
advice” fiduciary definition and related exemptions (Final Rule), which became generally applicable on June 9.  After considering the commentary it received, DOL has extended the Transition Period as proposed, without change. Thus, the same transition rules and standards in effect on June 9 will remain in effect until July 1, 2019.  Of particular note, the DOL explained that:
• It needs more time to “carefully and thoughtfully review” the commentary it has received and to honor the President’s directive, as well as to coordinate with the SEC, FINRA, NAIC and other regulators.
• It anticipates proposing a new streamlined class exemption in the near future, which presumably would address innovative products being developed in response to the Final Rule.
• It “sees no compelling reason” to further extend the “grandfathering exemption” (although it did solicit supplemental comments on this point going forward). The applicability date for determining whether a transaction may be grandfathered remains June 9, 2017.

Read More Here

Additional contributor to this post:

W. Mark Smithmarksmith@eversheds-sutherland.com

Securities: Top Five Unclaimed Property Issues

While securities have long been a hot spot for unclaimed property issues, the past several years have seen a continued expansion of audit activity targeting broker-dealers, stock issuers, transfer agents, mutual funds, banks, and others in the financial services industry. Unclaimed property laws—and unclaimed property audits—can present a number of specific challenges in this space.

Read More Here

Additional contributors to this post:

Holly H. Smithhollysmith@eversheds-sutherland.com

Mary Jane Wilson-Bilikmjwilson-bilik@eversheds-sutherland.com