The SEC today proposed a rule that could have a significant impact on advisers that outsource certain advisory or trading functions to third parties.

The new rule would require advisers to conduct initial due diligence and ongoing monitoring of service providers to whom covered functions are outsourced. SEC-registered advisers would have to reasonably identify and determine through due diligence that it would be appropriate to outsource the covered function, and that it would be appropriate to select that service provider, by complying with six specific elements. These elements address: (1) The nature and scope of the services; (2) Potential risks resulting from the service provider performing the covered function, including how to mitigate and manage such risks; (3) The service provider’s competence, capacity, and resources necessary to perform the covered function; (4) The service provider’s subcontracting arrangements related to the covered function; (5) Coordination with the service provider for Federal securities law compliance; and (6) The orderly termination of the provision of the covered function by the service provider.

Read more here.

Advisers paying third parties for client referrals (“promoters”) must determine whether they will need agreements with such promoters in order to comply with the new Marketing Rule and to ensure that any such agreements allow them to ensure compliance with the Marketing Rule’s disclosure, oversight and disqualification provisions pertaining to the use of paid testimonials and endorsements.

Among other things, advisers will want to consider the following with respect to agreements with promoters:

• Restrictions on the materials the promoter may use to promote the adviser’s services
• Processes for pre-approval of any materials to be used by the promote to promote the adviser’s services
• The Imposition of disclosure requirements for any marketing materials to be used by the promoter to ensure compliance with the Marketing Rule
• The right of the adviser to conduct ongoing due diligence on the promoter’s compliance with the Marketing Rule including the right to inspect books and records
• Inclusion of representations and warranties to be made by the promoter to ensure that it and its personnel are not disqualified from referring clients to the adviser

In a Risk Alert published today on the new Marketing Rule, the SEC announced that there will be a number of upcoming specific national initiatives designed to verify adviser compliance with the new Rule, which requires full compliance by November 4, 2022.

The SEC cited a number of areas which will be reviewed including:

• Verification that advisers have adopted policies and procedures reasonably designed to prevent violations of the Marketing Rule, including objective and testable means reasonably designed to prevent violations of the rule including conducting pre-reviews and approvals of advertisements, sampling advertisements utilized based on risk, and pre-approving advertising templates
• Testing whether advisers have a reasonable basis for any statements of material facts in any advertisements
• Verification that advisers are complying with performance reporting requirements including the proper use of net performance results, appropriate performance measurement periods, related performance, extracted performance, hypothetical performance, and predecessor performance
• Verification that advisers are maintaining the books and records required by the new Marketing Rule.

Read more here. 

Don’t assume you can disclose away all conflicts of interest – that’s the latest warning and reminder from the SEC to investment advisers and broker-dealers from a recently-published staff bulletin.

As a reminder, an SEC-registered adviser owes clients a fiduciary duty of loyalty to eliminate a conflict of interest or, at a minimum, make full and fair disclosure of the conflict of interest such that a client can provide informed consent to the conflict.

In the bulletin, the staff pointed out several circumstances where conflicts must be eliminated and not merely disclosed. For example, the staff believes that eliminating a conflict is appropriate where the conflict is of a nature and extent that it would be difficult for the adviser to provide full and fair disclosure, and the investment adviser cannot mitigate the conflict such that full and fair disclosure and informed consent are possible.

Read more here.

Signaling its increasing scrutiny on investment advisers managing crypto assets, the SEC and CFTC recently jointly proposed a rule that would require private fund managers who are required to file Form PF to report information on digital asset investments held by their private funds.

The release defines a “digital asset” as an asset that is issued or transferred using distributed ledger or blockchain technology including, but not limited to, virtual currencies, coins, and tokens.

Among other things, reporting managers would need to provide a good faith estimate of the percentage of the reporting fund’s net asset value invested in digital assets as well as the dollar value of long and short positions in digital assets.

Read more here.