{"id":1047,"date":"2020-06-11T14:58:06","date_gmt":"2020-06-11T14:58:06","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost\/?p=1047"},"modified":"2020-06-11T14:58:06","modified_gmt":"2020-06-11T14:58:06","slug":"strict-liability-has-no-place-in-should-have-known-case","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/bdia.pli.edu\/index.php\/2020\/06\/11\/strict-liability-has-no-place-in-should-have-known-case\/","title":{"rendered":"Strict Liability Has No Place In ‘Should Have Known’ Case"},"content":{"rendered":"

In a May 21, brief filed with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit in Thaddeus North v. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, the SEC turned “should have known” liability into a strict liability standard.[1] The D.C. Circuit should not apply this interpretation.<\/p>\n

Read why here<\/a><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

In a May 21, brief filed with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit in Thaddeus North v. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, the SEC turned “should have known” liability into a strict liability standard.[1] The D.C. Circuit should not apply this interpretation. Read why here  <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_exactmetrics_skip_tracking":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_active":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_note":"","_exactmetrics_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[23,22],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1047","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-compliance","category-standard-of-care"],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t